Tag: author
Nick Redfern’s Spying on the Saucer Writers
by Dirk Vander Ploeg on Feb.26, 2012, under Breaking News
Publisher's Note: I came across an article written by Nick Redfern on the Mysterious Universe website, entitled "Spying on the Saucer Writers'" As you could imagine I was intrigued by the subject as well as by the author. Dirk
This is a snippet of the article:
Let’s crank it up a notch
by UFO updates on Feb.23, 2012, under Breaking News
Close Encounters of the First Kind: Do we really care?
by UFO updates on Feb.14, 2012, under Breaking News

Here are twenty-one case drawings from the WW2 to 1957 era. It's interesting, I think, for anyone to just look at the array for a minute without me gabbling away making noise about them.
And here are the thumbnail case details for the sketches above. Hopefully you will be able to pop this graph up and magnify it if necessary; there are a lot of pixels in it.
I'm not sure what to begin to say. I'll be bonehead obvious to start. UFOs don't look alike. They especially don't look alike if they are anything but smooth featureless globes or disks, or cigars or ovals. As soon as you get features, then the simple description of a "UFO" goes out the window.
The drawing way at the top was one of Edward Ruppelt's favorite cases, and it has become one of mine as well --- whether it happened or not. This was the "shooting" incident which he was told about on one of his trips to Holloman AFB. An officer there told him that a pilot had fired his weapons at a UFO [VERY controversial thing to do] and even showed Ruppelt the incident report WHICH THE OFFICER PROMPTLY BURNED!!! Ruppelt was thoroughly boggled by this, BUT HE BELIEVED IT. We know that he believed it because he presented this incident prominently before the CIA investigation panel [The Robertson Panel]. Could we have actually had a USAF/UFO shooting incident in late 1951? Earth’s Destiny Beyond 2012
by Theresa J. Thurmond Morris on Feb.11, 2012, under Breaking News
We all have a story to tell and this is one that is in touch with all of our spirits as we are all in a soul's collective with our universal programming. This author has a mission which we can all relate too in this lifetime. That is why I have agreed to share this book review. Alien Civilizations Exist and deep down in our DNA we all know it!
Welcome to the jungle
by UFO updates on Jan.20, 2012, under Breaking News
Deconstructing the Alexander the Great UFO story
by UFO updates on Dec.20, 2011, under Breaking News
Revisiting the famous 1979 UFO Debate at the House of Lords
by UFO updates on Nov.18, 2011, under Breaking News
More Strange Sounds Recorded
by UFO updates on Nov.14, 2011, under Breaking News
Video Link
[Note: Below is what the author of the video posted. It is unedited.]
From DaisyJays- March 12, 2011
**UPDATE** Check out the two links Below** I'm Thinking HAARP EXPERIMENT**
http://www.wctv.tv/home/headlines/Tornado-like_Sounds_Worried_A_Few_Residents...
Also this was posted on this link below :
Last night I was surprised to see that the Tallahassee, FL, National Weather Service admitted that the returns on the radar were "military chaff", not rain. This area got bombarded on Monday and yesterday. See the second paragraph below.
FXUS62 KTAE 090203
AFDTAE
AREA FORECAST DISCUSSION
NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE TALLAHASSEE FL
903 PM EST TUE MAR 8 2011
...SEVERE STORMS POSSIBLE WEDNESDAY...
.UPDATE...
THE FORECAST FOR TONIGHT APPEARS TO BE ON TRACK WITH GRADUALLY
INCREASING CLOUD COVER AND LOW TEMPERATURES RANGING FROM THE MID
50S OVER THE EASTERN FORECAST AREA TO NEAR 60 OVER THE WEST. A
FEW SHOWERS COULD REACH THE WESTERN BORDER AREAS LATE TONIGHT BUT
MOST OF THE SIGNIFICANT RAIN SHOULD HOLD OFF UNTIL DURING THE DAY
ON WEDNESDAY.
ALTHOUGH RADARS THIS EVENING ARE PICKING UP ECHOES ACROSS THE
FORECAST AREA...THESE ECHOES ARE LIKELY THE RESULT OF MILITARY
CHAFF AND NOT RAINFALL AS THERE IS CURRENTLY LITTLE CLOUD COVER
WHERE THESE ECHOES ARE LOCATED.
http://aircrap.org/wright-patterson-air-traffic-controllers-vindicate-chemtra...
Tallahassee Florida, 3-09-2011.. Around 6:30 on.
What is this noise??? We thought for sure it was a Tornado, But it never changed it's position, and it lasted for well over 20 minutes or so... It was Soooo Loud, and it was shaking the house and the ground.
I called 911, They said they didnt know what it was, But that there were MANY calls coming in about the noise. They said they were sending patrols out to check it out...
There was a Flash of light that came from the same direction of the noise, then the noise just faded away. It was a relief obviously, I still thought it may have been a Tornado, But it also wasn't making any sense to me. We even put the kids in the bathtub and put a mattress over them just in case.
I called the News Station also, They told me it wasn't a Tornado, And that the police had told them to tell people it was an airplane revving it's engine at the airport. I live 4 miles from the airport, And I have lived here for 20 years, I have never heard an An airplane rev its engine at the airport, that was just insanity.
So when the noise was over, we drove down to the airport and stopped at a gas station nearby, They said they didnt hear anything. So it was not coming from that direction!
AND, on the 11 o'clock news that night, the weather man made a comment about all the calls that had come in about the noise, He said, Dont worry, It wasn't a Tornado, and it was confirmed that it WASN'T an Airplane, ALL You were hearing was THUNDER!!!..
If anyone has ever heard Thunder that was anything like that, Please let me know. It is just so Strange to me that the Stories kept changing.. Like we are stupid or something and dont know what Thunder sounds like.
Anyway, I Dont Know What it was.. But if you have any clue at all, Please do tell
Also, Very strange how after the Flash of light there was no thunder, the noise actually stopped.
Oh, and the NASA Space shuttle Discovery had already landed in south Florida about 5 hours earlier that day. It wouldn't have hovered for 20 minutes anyway, But just saying.
I had to load this video in a lesser format so that it would upload... If i can find out how to do a higher quality I will.
HAARP????
* * *
Video Link
The witness was recording from his porch. The light is a street light, nothing more.
* * *
Video link
[Note: Below is what the author of the video wrote. It is unedited.]
By jpagel on Apr 24, 2008
OK, first of all I had no idea this video was going to be this popular. Pretty exciting stuff. Anyways, there's alot of arguing on here about sound in space. Obviously sound needs a medium to pass through, to vibrate through so that it can carry the sound waves. Space has no air, and therefore cannot project sound in audible wave form. As it says in the description, these sounds are not from satellites zooming around the earth with a normal microphone. Sohpisticated instruments can detect the different sonic vibrations going on in the planet GENERALLY. So what you are hearing is not what it would be like if you just stuck an ear out the window of a space ship. First of all you would probably either die or go deaf in that ear for the rest of your life because of the pressure of the vaccum. What the remote sensors on the sattellite are doing is analyzing different radio frequencies coming off the surface of the earth and converting it into audible soundwaves for you and I to hear. So you're not hearing whales, you're not hearing cars or even wind. You're merely hearing the general frequencies of the Earth in an audible format.
here's where i got the sound file
http://www.inner-net.com/bmr/bmrpg2aa.html
*
Previous Post:
What's that sound? The "Hum" Heard 'Round The World
*********************************************
The Nick Redfern Interview and The Real Men in Black
by David Jones on Oct.28, 2011, under Breaking News
Publisher's Note: David Jones, editor of New Dawn magazine was kind enough to share this amazing interview the magazine recently conducted with author Nick Redfern. Dirk
Lights Over Rhome, Texas
by UFO updates on Oct.18, 2011, under Breaking News
![]() |
| Photos are actual size. |
This report from a witness in Rhome, Texas was submitted to MUFON.
*
MUFON Case # 32674
Date: 2011-10-13
Time: 21:30
Status: Assigned
City: Rhome
State: Texas
Shape: Circle,Oval,Star-like
Distance: One mile or less
Summary: Just went out back to walk dogs with the back porch lights out. Then saw formation
Report: ( Editor's Note: This report contains spelling corrections only.)
I had taken our dogs outside to walk them and left the back porch light out. Looked up and saw the formation, it caught my eye because the objects were so bright, by the time I took dogs back in then got our camera, I took 3 pictures which I would like someone to analyze them.
Was a straight formation at first 5 separate objects or 1 huge one, then they made kind of a wavy formation, then separated into their own hoovering space.
This went on for at least 45 minutes, and I heard a helicopter but never saw it, and of course looking in the other direction we can see aircraft that are going to DFW airport.
Whatever these objects are they seem to come out at least twice a week, and anyone that lives in the shalecreek housing addition as we do can clearly see them, they do not seem to worry about being seen, considering how close we are to an air base.
Photo links:
http://www.mufoncms.com/files/32674_submitter_file1__183.jpg
http://www.mufoncms.com/files/32674_submitter_file2__185.jpg
http://www.mufoncms.com/files/32674_submitter_file3__191.jpg
* * *
[Please note that the witness wishes for someone to analyze the photos included in this report. Might I suggest that if the author of the photos can not tell much from looking at the photos shown in this report, it is very doubtful that anyone else can either.
My suggestion to people who attempt to take photos of UFOs (unidentified flying objects), is to use a camera that will give you something besides a thumbnail sized photo.
If you want your photos analyzed, use a digital camera that can be set to take high resolution photos. Attach high resolution photos to your submitted report.
Better still, if you have a 35 mm camera, have the film developed. A photo scanned at high resolution is quite acceptable. If you have the original film, that is even better. Thanks. - SW]
************************************




